"This article explores the distinction between law and fact in the context of dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and, in particular, the limitation of appeals to issues of law. This distinction is becoming increasingly important, as WTO appellants more frequently claim that the Panel erred in fulfilling its function (e.g., by failing to make an objective assessment of the facts of the case), and appellees more frequently resort to procedural objections." (Quoted from paper)